Raise the Hammer
By: Ryan McGreal
Published: 2006/09/25 (Category: Aerotropolis)
This just in from Hamiltonians for Progressive Development: HPD and the Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing settled with the City of Hamilton over its controversial Aerotropolis plans.
City Council voted in 2005 to expand the urban boundary 1,254 hectares into farmland around Hamilton International Airport to develop "aerotropolis", an industrial zone based around air transport.
HPD and the Ministry filed an appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) over the process the city had followed. According to an HPD press release, the OMB decision
requires the City to change the language of the disputed Official Plan Amendment approved by city council in July 2005. These changes protect prime agricultural lands and ensure that further public debate and consultations will take place before any proposed urban boundary expansion can occur.
Until now, the city has refused even to contemplate a long-term plan that does not include the aerotropolis development. GRIDS, the City of Hamilton's long-term planning exercise, included aerotropolis in all six of its planning scenarios.
Last year, after two public meetings in which the overwhelming majority of citizen delegates spoke with concerns about or in opposition to the proposed urban boundary expansion, city council went ahead and approved the plan.
When asked why the city did not study the proposal before rezoning the land, Mayor Larry Di Ianni explained during an interview with Raise the Hammer:
it may have been nice for people who don't believe in aerotropolis for whatever reason, but it wouldn't have been honest, though. Because the region before us, and the city since - even before amalgamation and certainly since amalgamation - has always said, you know, 'The answer, part of the answer to some of the problems that we've got is around the best use of airport lands.
With this new OMB ruling, perhaps Hamilton will be able to escape the burdens of its own short-sighted planning legacy.
yea, help us out...I'm lost.
By Ryan | http://www.raisethehammer.org
Posted 9/26/2006 9:17:02 AM
I've just posted another blog entry that goes into more detail on the OMB decision:
http://www.raisethehammer.org/blog/319/
NewsfeedsISSN: 1715-1554
James North Holiday Displays - Saturday, December 6, 2008, at James North Arts District, .
Read More...
Harper: GG to Prorogue Parliament (Dec. 4, 2008) -
Prime Minister Stephen Harper just announced after meeting with Governor General Michaëlle Jean that she has agreed to his request to prorogue the two-week-old Parliament until his government
Read More...
City Traffic Staff: Actuated Signals Will Accommodate Cyclists (Dec. 4, 2008) -
Earlier this week, the City Traffic Department announced that they want to try and speed up traffic on James and John Streets, including spending $60,000 to convert four intersections to actuated
Read More...
Harper crosses the line in speech to nation (Dec. 4, 2008) - In a cynical speech last night, Prime Minister Stephen Harper crossed the line from partisan into more dangerous territory as he implied that the Liberal-NDP coalition was an attack on Canada's de
Read More...
McMaster ruffles some feathers with child ward renaming (Dec. 3, 2008) - An article in the Globe and Mail, Health care in a bucket with fries, came to the attention of a RTH reader recently, who sent it along for us to check out (thanks, by the way!)
The article is ab
Read More...
Can Harper Prorogue Parliament? (Dec. 3, 2008) -
Given the paucity of Prime Minister Stephen Harpers options as Monday's confidence vote draws closer, pundits and analysts are coalescing around the conclusion that he will ask Governor Genera
Read More...
Picking a Prime Minister: A Parliamentary Primer (Dec. 2, 2008) -
We will use all legal means to resist this undemocratic seizure of power.
-- Prime Minister Stephen Harper
With the Liberals and NDP agreeing to a coalition with the support of the B
Read More...
Bratina: City Hall Plan Could Save $110 Million Over 20 Years (Dec. 2, 2008) -
Councillor Bob Bratina, who has proposed that the City remain at Hamilton City Centre, is claiming that this move will cost only $50 million over the next 20 years, compared to $150 million to com
Read More...
City Backs Down on Airport Development Size (Dec. 1, 2008) -
Citizens at City Hall (CATCH) reports that the city has backed down on at least one aspect of its dispute with the province on the size of the Airport Economic Growth District (AEGD), a planned in
Read More...
By adrian | http://socialtech.ca/ade/
Posted 9/25/2006 2:53:05 PM
Can you clarify what this means exactly? Does this mean Hamilton must consult the public more before going ahead? Does that actually mean anything?
(Permalink)