Comment 72350

By Theo (anonymous) | Posted December 16, 2011 at 17:03:16

Greetings Real Legal Story,

Being fairly new to RTH, and per your suggestion, I read the CATCH post you noted. That was then, this is now. Regardless if "Larry" is "sneering" or not, it seems that this is not about the Red Hill legal costs issue, or the moral compass of "value for skill" over the raise that Ms. Chapman got, deserved or otherwise, but rather the way that it was granted, the seeming disclusion of Council from the process, the current policy surrounding non-union staff compensation, and the backtracking that the Mayor performed on the issue. Many questions remain unasked and unanswered - it would be helpful if some further information from the meeting between Council and the Mayor was to be forthcoming...

Reply | Permalink | Context

You must be logged in to vote on this comment.

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds