Raise the Hammer

A mountain resident who has been around for a while was quoted in the paper. And she nailed it. Hamilton, she said, we've been there and done that and ripped up the tracks....find another way.

i agree entirely! rail based public transit is old fashioned, i suggest we invest in technology that has a future like hoover pods or matter transference beams. i saw a show on it once and it looked really cool.

we ripped up the tracks because HSR officials got in the sack with bus technology companies (would you really expect that they made that decision based on public interest??). Transit has stunk ever since they removed the tracks and overhead for trolley buses. LRT will finally allow Hamilton to function like a real city again. I'm excited that most residents are recognizing that.

"A mountain resident who has been around for a while was quoted in the paper. And she nailed it. Hamilton, she said, we've been there and done that and ripped up the tracks....find another way."

Hey everybody! I think I found a "squelcher"!

"hoover pods" That would be awesome, riding your vacuum cleaner to work. Clean the streets as you go!

As for good old missus 'been there done that', well, lots of cities got rid of their streetcars during the 20th century, and lots of them are regretting doing it, and lots of them are thinking of putting streetcars back in. Hamilton has made a lot of dumb decisions over the years, I guess you just want us to keep on making them forever.

What nobrainer said -- don't be a squelcher. Too many Hamilton dreams have been squelched allready. We were once called The Ambitious City. I want to live in an ambitous city again.

Yes, that's a great idea for everyone to show their support for rapid transit, especially light rail. I went to the rapid transit website and filled out a comment form and sent it in. We can't let this opportunity pass us by. Do show your support for this initiative and complete one of those comment forms.

Anyone who knows Hamilton's transit history will know that Hamilton streetcars were a successful business until Canada Coach Lines bought them and converted the system to buses.

After the conversion to buses, the situation got so bad CCL was forced to sell the HSR and itself to the city of Hamilton.

It turns out "been there done that" with streetcars is positive, but for buses it is negative.

i searched the city website for an hour but couldn't find the HSR mandate section that states one of the guiding principles of transit in hamilton should be generating revenue for WRCU2. nor could i find any mention that only "regular folk" as defined by WRCU2 get a say in the future of transit in hamilton. however, i can understand not wanting to give Harry Stinson a chance to comment, as his opinion might actually be well informed and based on fact as to what will benefit the city in the long term.

as far as bad poetry goes:

there once was a WRCU2 from Nantucket...

Et tu, WRCU2? Like our old friend Baystreeter, you have set up a neat little Catch 22, where the opinions of people who show up to meetings don't count by virtue of the fact that they're the sort of people who bother to show up to meetings. We pay lip service to democratic ideals, but the minute citizens become engaged, we marginalize them by declaring them to be a special interest group. I wasn't at the Light Rail meeting (Does that make me "regular"? Am I allowed to have an opinion, or do you need to see my clothing and choice of caffeinated beverages first?), but I've been to plenty of other community meetings and I'm getting pretty sick of being told that I'm some kind of hippy who doesn't count just because I give a crap. Not only is this tiresome, but it's deeply dangerous to democracy, as it serves to discourage citizens from getting involved. Maybe that's the idea.

Light rail *isn't* streetcars. This isn't putting back in what the HSR took out, though it is sad that those were taken out way back when.

WRCU2, you still have made no argument as to why light rail transit is the lesser of the two transit options for hamilton. i have seen plenty of arguments for light rail but all you can come up with is that the real people of the city are not represented in the group supporting it. And that because Harry Stinson has seen some success, and some failure, on a scale few of us have the courage to attempt, his support is automatically seen as a self serving agenda. completely unlike your self serving agenda of wanting to pay lower taxes of course!

perhaps you have some, more than anecdotal, evidence of general public support for bus rapid transit, based on fact, that you would like to share with us.

perhaps you would like to share why light rail transit is, in your opinion, a pipe dream.

nicely done Ryan :)

When LRT is built, perhaps we can arrange that WRCU2 can refrain from paying the transit levy.

Keep in mind, W... this will require you to wear an ankle cuff that disallows you entry to the train, the stations, and any new developments along the line.

But don't worry W, you can continue to pay at the pump and visit all of your favourite destinations by car. And before too long our $4.50 round trip fare will represent the cost of a single litre of your gasoline.

Bon voyage!