Today, the City will publish an information report detailing the alignment and design of the Hamilton light rail transit lines.
By Ryan McGreal
Published April 27, 2016
This article has been updated.
Today, the City will publish an information report detailing the alignment and design of the Hamilton light rail transit (LRT) lines. The report will be presented to the Light Rail Transit Sub-Committee at their May 2 meeting.
Hamilton LRT map
Hamilton LRT map legend
The design was prepared in partnership between the City's LRT Coordination office and Metrolinx, with technical assistance from transportation consultant Steer Davies Gleave.
According to Paul Johnson, Director of LRT Coordination for the City, the team's overriding design objective has been to design a system that is "rapid, reliable and safe". This has guided their decisions in working through the various constraints and challenges across the length of the line.
The design is refreshingly free of the awkward compromises that hobbled the previous design in an attempt to preserve the status quo. As Johnson said in an interview with RTH, "If we're going to build this, let's build this."
Now that the preliminary design is going public, the City and Metrolinx will undertake a broad, extensive consultation process with residents and stakeholders to incorporate local expertise and fine-tune the plan.
LRT will operate on two tracks in the centre of the street, one track eastbound and one westbound. Perhaps the biggest change from the previous design was to move the alignment to the centre of the street instead of along the south curb, and to switch King Street from one-way westbound vehicle traffic to two-way vehicle traffic (with a couple of exceptions).
LRT vehicles will have signal priority at intersections, meaning that traffic signals will be designed to hold green or quickly cycle back to green if an LRT vehicle is approaching.
In addition, station boarding platforms will be located just past the intersection, so that the vehicle will pull through the intersection and let passengers on and off on the far side.
Typical cross-section of a far-side LRT stop (Image Credit: City of Hamilton)
This is called a "far side platform," and it helps reduce delays by ensuring that the vehicle can take off immediately after the last passenger has gotten on or off instead of getting stuck behind a red traffic signal. It also coordinates the traffic signals so that people will be able to cross King Street after disembarking.
With the advent of LRT, King Street will no longer be an arterial road for through traffic. Instead, it will mainly serve as an access road for local traffic, with the arterial role taken over by the LRT line.
Major intersections will allow vehicles to make left turns across the LRT tracks, but some minor intersections will not. This restriction on turning movements has led to some consternation, but it's important to remember that with King Street going two-way, there will be a significant addition of new turning movements for vehicles turning eastbound onto King.
Starting at the west end, the line will begin on Main Street West at Cootes Drive and run in the centre lanes, with two lanes of traffic on either side. The line will no longer loop through McMaster campus, in order to ensure that there is enough distance between the LRT line and the university's electron microscope that vibrations and electrical interference from the line won't affect the equipment.
The McMaster transit terminal, currently on Cootes Drive north of Scholar's Road, will be moved to the corner of Main and Cootes, where there is currently a surface parking lot. It will include up to 14 bays for HSR, GO Transit and other regional bus services.
McMaster is also investigating the possibility of incorporating a new building above the terminal.
Originally, the LRT plan called for stations at both Cootes Drive and McMaster University Medical Centre, but the decision was to eliminate the McMaster Medical Centre because it is so close to Cootes and having two stops in close proximity works against the goal of a rapid system.
The plan calls for bike lanes on Main Street in addition to the two-way LRT line and four lanes of vehicle traffic. The specific design of the bike lanes have not yet been finalized: they could be painted one-way lanes on either side of the street, physically protected one-way lanes on either side of the street, or a physically protected cycle track or multi-use path on one side of the street.
With a street as busy as Main West, it is a no-brainer that any cycling infrastructure should be physically protected from vehicle traffic. For example, parents in Ainslie Wood thinking of biking with their children to school in Westdale will not be willing to do so if the only protection from two lanes of vehicle traffic is a painted line.
Whether that makes more sense as one-way cycle tracks on each side of a two-way cycle track on one side will be determined through further design work.
After Cootes Drive, the next LRT station stop will be at Main and Longwood Road, and that is the last stop before the line crosses Highway 403. This seems like a long distance between stops, and there may be a decision through the public consultation process to add in another stop in West Hamilton, possibly in the area of Dalewood Avenue.
East of Macklin Street South, the LRT line will veer off Main Street just past the Beverly Hills Apartment building to a new dedicated overpass that will cross Highway 403 and join King Street West.
From there, the LRT line will proceed down the centre of King Street with one lane of vehicle traffic on either side, one eastbound and one westbound. However, King Street will no longer function as an arterial through street.
The line will pass the MacNab transit terminal and cross the north-south tracks of the A-Line (about which more below), but the two lines will not cross-connect. Passengers switching from the B-Line to the A-Line will have to transfer.
There will be some impacts for vehicle access to the various underground parking garages in the Bay - James segment, and one option is to convert Summer's Lane to two-way vehicle traffic.
The plan also calls for a higher-order pedestrian corridor linking the LRT with the current Hunter Street GO Station. Staff originally envisioned that it would run up MacNab Street from the MacNab Transit Terminal and east on Hunter to the GO Station, but now they are leaning toward running the pedestrian corridor up Hughson from Gore Park.
There will be a couple of locations along King where vehicle traffic will be restricted to just one lane, particularly through the International Village between John Street and Wellington Street. In this stretch, the LRT line will run next to the north curb with just one eastbound lane south of the line.
The reason for this alignment was to allow vehicle access to businesses on the south side of King, which was an important issue identified by business stakeholders. On the north side, businesses will be able to achieve vehicle access via an east-west alleyway running between King and King William. Staff are studying an alley improvement strategy.
One option for the eastbound lane on King through this stretch is to design it as a pedestrian-friendly "shared space" in a manner similar to Hess Village or King William Street.
George Street in Hess Village (RTH file photo)
Another option for local access and loading/unloading is through side streets - Catharine, Mary, Walnut, Ferguson and Spring. Again, it makes sense to convert more of these streets to two-way, especially considering that they will likely not be through streets at King.
East of Wellington, the LRT line will run in the middle of the street with a lane of traffic on either side.
The Scott Park station will be extra-wide to allow for heavy capacity of passengers travelling two and from events at Tim Horton Stadium.
One challenge will be the CP rail line that crosses Main Street diagonally at Gage and crosses King at East Bend Avenue. It is still an active line and can cause delays of up to eight minutes when a train is crossing.
CP train crossing at Main and Gage (RTH file photo)
Ward 3 Councillor Matthew Green is looking at options to take the line out of service, given the current impacts on quality of life for local residents.
Moving east to the Delta, where King and Main crisscross, it will likely be necessary to reconfigure the intersection to make it safer and less confusing for all users. At this point, the LRT line will switch back to Main Street East.
At Delta itself, the decision was made to remove the proposed station, although this may be reconsidered during the review and public consultation stage.
The line will run in the centre lanes of Main with a lane of traffic on either side until it ends at the Queenston Traffic Circle (QTC). This eastern terminus is not ideal from an operational point of view, since it does not serve as a significant transit hub today.
For the time being, express bus service will continue east along Queenston Road to the transit terminal at Eastgate Square. This was originally supposed to be the eastern terminus of the LRT line, but a decision was made to end the line at Queenston and add a north-south spur connecting the B-Line to the James North GO Station.
This decision connects the LRT line to regional rapid transit, which is a mandate of the Province, and it also neutralizes the vocal opposition of Ward 5 Councillor Chad Collins, who enthused, "East Hamilton businesses have dodged a bullet" when the announcement came that the line would stop at QTC.
However, the Province has made it clear that the current route is only phase one and that the line will be extended to Eastgate Square in the future.
The property immediately adjacent to QTC on the east is the former City Motor Hotel, which the City expropriated in 2013 and had planned to develop into a dense, mixed-use building.
Now, the thinking is that it will be used as the location of the eastern terminus for the LRT line, with bus connections to the B-Line express and other local routes.
One possibility is to combine the two plans with a development that includes a terminal on the main floor and residential units on upper levels. The challenge is that this terminal is intended to be temporary until the line is extended to Eastgate, so it would have to be designed in such a way that the main floor can be adapted for a different use once it is no longer needed as a bus terminal.
The LRT plan also includes a north-south spur connecting the B-Line to the James North GO Station. This spur is effectively the first part of the city's planned A-Line rapid transit, which is currently served by an A-Line express bus service.
The decision was made to put the A-Line LRT directly on James Street. This is the most direct path to the James North GO Station, and if there is enough room in the budget it will allow the line to be extended all the way to the waterfront at Guise Street.
Unlike the B-Line, which will run on its own dedicated lanes, the A-Line will run in mixed traffic on James, streetcar-style. This minimizes the need to expropriate properties along James and allows the street to continue its grassroots revival.
While running in mixed traffic is not ideal from an operational perspective, the distance is short enough - and vehicle traffic is moderate enough - that there won't be much difference in speed between mixed traffic and dedicated lanes.
Also, the B-Line and A-Line routes will not be cross-connected, so vehicles on one line won't be able to transfer directly to the other. As a result, passengers wanting to switch lines will have to get a transfer at King and James.
One notable absence from this information report is a decision on what, if any, changes need to be made to the street network to accommodate westbound vehicle traffic.
The transportation consultant is currently undertaking detailed traffic modelling studies based on the addition of LRT on King to determine the availability and need for westbound traffic capacity.
The most obvious solution is to convert Main Street to two-way. Main is currently five lanes of one-way eastbound traffic, a design that is deeply harmful to street life on Main. Thanks to the "platooning" of vehicle traffic due to synchronized traffic signals, the street alternates between waves of roaring traffic and ghostly silences.
Looking east on Main Street West (RTH file photo)
Main Street East between Erie and Ontario (RTH file photo)
During the ill-fated transit-only lane pilot, it was impossible not to notice that Main Street sat mostly empty during periods when King Street was backed up. This is a waste of scarce, expensive public right-of-way.
Sparse traffic on Main Street (RTH file photo)
However, staff will not make a decision about possible changes to the road system until after the traffic modelling study is completed some time this summer.
Another possibility which staff would not rule out is the option to remove the Cannon Street Cycle Track to add a lane of westbound vehicle capacity on Cannon, and then reconfigure Dundurn Street North to connect with the Highway 403 exits on King Street. (Dundurn North currently has bike lanes on either side.)
This would be a terrible idea. It would undermine the multi-modal transportation system of which LRT is supposed to be the centrepiece, and it would turn many cycling advocates against the LRT plan when they should be natural allies.
It would be particularly cruel to remove the city's best piece of cycling infrastructure merely in order to preserve the grossly damaging one-way orientation of Main Street. It would go directly against the staff imperative to design for transformational success rather than designing to preserve the status quo.
This is a preliminary design report, and it will be further refined in the coming months as the city undertakes a broad, extensive public consultation process to engage residents and stakeholders.
Some of the issues up for reconsideration and refinement:
Improving the bike lanes on Main West to be physically protected. This has not yet been finalized, and there is an exciting opportunity to do something really transformative with the bike lane design.
Adding or moving stations. The distances between stations are very long in West Hamilton, between Scott Park and Ottawa, and between Parkdale and Nash. The frequency of stations has to be balanced with the desire for rapid movement - too many stations will slow down the service, but too few stations will make it inaccessible.
Adding more dedicated pedestrian crossings. Under the current plan, there are some fairly long stretches with no pedestrian crossings. It will make sense to engage with local residents to determine the best places to add more crossings. For example, Pearl Street is already a de facto north-south pedestrian and cycling greenway connecting Strathcona and Kirkendall neighbourhoods, and there should be a safe LRT crossing here.
Improving cross-street access. Most secondary cross streets will not have left-turning access onto King, but some of these may be up for reconsideration if safety concerns can be addressed. In addition, it will make sense to convert more of these streets to two-way traffic in order to allow vehicles to find sensible paths through the downtown.
Over the next few months, the City will consult extensively with stakeholders - including visiting every property and business along the line twice a year until the LRT is completed - to incorporate local expertise and fine-tune the design.
LRT vehicle on display outside City Hall last year (RTH file photo)
Finally, it's important to note that this is an information report, not a request for permission. The Province is footing the bill for this project and Metrolinx owns its design and implementation. This is emphatically not an occasion for Hamilton City Council to try and micromanage the file.
Doubtless, there will be a few councillors who will seize the opportunity to play wedge politics, but it must be stressed that they do not have the final say in this design.
As Andrew Hope, Hamilton LRT project lead for Metrolinx, clarified in an email to RTH:
[T]he City and Metrolinx are working in partnership to deliver the project. The City was the sole proponent for the 2011 [Environmental Assessment], but per the recently approved Memorandum of Agreement for the project we have agreed that the City and Metrolinx will be co-proponents for the EA Addendum process.
None of this changes the role of Metrolinx in the project. We will continue to manage the procurement process (together with Infrastructure Ontario), oversee the construction of the project, and will ultimately own the project once it is completed and in service.
The addendum to the Environmental Assessment will be completed between September 2016 and spring 2017, and that will include many formal opportunities for feedback through public information centres (PICs), stakeholder meetings, telephone town halls and other forms of engagement.
Update: the agenda for the May 2 LRT Sub-Committee meeting has gone live. It includes the LRT Alignment information report, but we can't link to it directly because the City's committee website is unusable-by-design, but it's item 8.1 under Discussion Items.
You must be logged in to comment.