Editorial

Boxes Inside Boxes

The big box model destroys the possibility of any street life in its surroundings.

By Ryan McGreal
Published June 16, 2005

Look at every big box conglomeration in the Hamilton area (Ancaster Meadowlands, Upper James, etc.), and the same arrangement is repeated:

Instead of building to the sidewalk, facing outward, and opening onto the street, every store turns in toward the interior parking lot, apparently ashamed of its surroundings. This, of course, is consistent with every other architectural travesty built since the 1960s.

Rather than weaving stores firmly into the fabric of the built environment, the big box model segregates stores from their environment inside a bubble that may as well be hermetically sealed to non-drivers.

Take a look at this satellite photo of Upper James and Rymal.


Typical big box conglomeration, northwest corner of Upper James and Rymal (Image Credit: Google Maps)

The smaller buildings on the south and east edges of the development are theoretically on the street, but go there and you'll notice that every one of them points into the parking lot, not out to the street. Reflecting the reality of its surroundings, one of those buildings is a drive-thru bank.

On the surface, it looks like the big box model is a reversal of the mall model, in which a big box in the centre is surrounded on all sides by parking. However, the only real difference between self-contained malls and self-contained big box developments is that people walk through malls but drive through big box developments.


The traditional mall: an enclosed space in the middle of the block, surrounded on all sides by parking. An internal hallway connects the stores.


The Big Box development: a huge parking lot in the middle of the block, with box stores around the edges. Stores face the interior lot, and are not connected by an indoor hallway.

Traditional malls are usually located on cheap suburban land and can only be reached by car, but at least visitors walk once they arrive. Big Box developments replace the interior hallway with a huge parking lot, locating the stores around the edges of the block, facing inward.

Many big box developments, like the gargantuan strip along Golf Links Road in Ancaster, are so colossal and so lacking in basic pedestrian infrastructure that it is nearly impossible to walk from one store to another.


The development along Golf Links Road is so big that a 'street' runs through its middle to connect the stores. Shoppers drive from one box to the next.

It is no overstatement to say that the big box model destroys the possibility of any street life in its surroundings. When it is built on a greenfield, the big box creates and reflects a car-oriented mode of physical and social organization.

When it is retrofitted into an existing urban area, especially one that is struggling against the odds to rebound from a half-century of suburbanization, the big box cannot help but repel pedestrians and overwhelm the street life of its surroundings.

Ryan McGreal, the editor of Raise the Hammer, lives in Hamilton with his family and works as a programmer, writer and consultant. Ryan volunteers with Hamilton Light Rail, a citizen group dedicated to bringing light rail transit to Hamilton. Several of his essays have been published in the Hamilton Spectator. Ryan also maintains a personal website and has been known to post passing thoughts on twitter.

0 Comments

View Comments: Nested | Flat

Post a Comment

Comment Anonymously
Screen Name
What do you get if you divide 12 by 3?
Leave This Field Blank
Comment

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Site Tools

Feeds