Comment 98838

By JasonAAllen (registered) - website | Posted March 21, 2014 at 11:53:38 in reply to Comment 98832

Hence the appeal to the OMB. It was initiated prior to the secondary plan being approved, for that reason. That being said, the Drive Through is a 'legal non-conforming use', and it's expansion would have likely survived the implementation of the SSP. Because the drive-through was grandfathered in, it's very difficult to get rid of it, or so it was explained at the meeting.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds