Comment 98223

By matthewsweet (registered) | Posted March 05, 2014 at 22:38:30 in reply to Comment 98216

With all due respect, what makes your "quick idea" "whipped...up on the fly this morning" any better than Bratina's plan, likely sketched on the back of a cocktail napkin? Where are the ROI studies, economic development potential, land use studies, transportation needs assessments for your so-called compromise? This sort of drawing lines on the map and calling it proper transit planning is exactly the kind of nonsense that should be avoided at all costs.

Sorry for being harsh. But I think this is a road to avoid going down because it muddies the waters even further, which is precisely what BoBra is attempting to do. The plan that exists on paper is a good plan, thoroughly researched and studied, so let's do our level best to stick to that plan. It may seem "open-minded" to consider alternatives now, but the alternatives were considered and dismissed in favour of the preferred alternative. Considering what is at stake, sticking to the plan and holding ground is far wiser.

By moylek (registered) - website Posted March 18, 2013 at 16:04:11 in reply to Comment 87287

The world will make more sense to you, Capitalist, when you start seeing a world full of people instead of cardboard stereotypes.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds