Comment 90197

By newspaper accountability (anonymous) | Posted July 11, 2013 at 15:54:32 in reply to Comment 37419

I agree that interestingly Mr. Cunningham again does not get his facts straight, which is a characteristic given his Spectator and Toronto Star comments of being victimized in a divorce which he alone dragged out for over a decade due to using his refusal to not disclose and his use of judicial/legal influence to sign false affidavits,unaudited financial statements, using personal undertakings which can be changed behind the back of the courts without the onus of the banks to reveal this; using Halton police to fabricate a report of having gone to the banks and finding no assets - when post judicial decision it was found that the police report was fraudulent and without merit - no police warrants or court orders forcing bank disclosure. No oiprd, Chief Blair action on the fraudulent report that garnered a false judicial decision from Justice Patillo and Justice Coats. For four years he refused as a former MPP to pay spousal support (claimed to have paid and did not pay, claimed he would pay if his spouse paid and then sat on all the monies, wrote cheques out to himself, wrote cheques with sticky notes that payments should bounce back to him - you get the idea) and made his spouse on a fixed income pay improperly downloaded and divided child support and education for 5 years for a 4 yr. degree when he knew the child had completed only 2 years of university. False claims of abuse, child alienation, bullying the ex's family with false, vexatious defamation suits against a vulnerable senior father in law, not paying equalization nor contract rights as demanded in their Borden and Ladler contract; claiming to to be the victim all while seizing the home of the ex wife, alienating the only child, attempting to seize the car of the ex wife and attempting to seize the ex wife's bank accounts based on a Justice Coats decision - with a non disclosed multiple - conflict of interest giving Mr. Cunningham all the rights and the ex wife no judicial independence what so ever...and having undisclosed Melrose corp, OEB International, sitting on profitable boards such as Woodland Chemical Systems Inc...all while lying with unaudited statements (claiming to make only 19k) and not paying a cent to a ex wife of 24yrs who paid millions into a marriage. Manipulating the law, lying and bullying should not be allowed among counsels nor judges who are placed in positions of trust - nor should the Toronto Star and Hamilton Spectator place one sided and non researched articles in the paper to protect a vindictive and dishonest politician.



Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds