Comment 85260

By Pxtl (registered) - website | Posted January 17, 2013 at 12:30:16

it's also worth a stark contrast:

The government has heavy sin-taxes on cigarettes and alcohol to discourage excessive use. Drinking and smoking too much in Ontario is expensive, and beyond the profits made by the government they're deliberately expensive to discourage excessive use for your own health.

In gambling, losing that money is the bad health outcome. So the government's involvement in the price of gambling isn't really a health benefit. Expensive smoking reduces smoking. Expensive drinking reduces drinking. Expensive gambling is redundant. Heck, if gambling were cheap, there wouldn't be anything wrong with it. Cheap gambling would be like smoking without lung-cancer and heart disease.

So the government's involvement in making money off of gambling looks a lot less defensible vs smoking and drinking.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds