-
Yes We Cannon!
Join the Movement and Spread the Word
Recent Articles
- Public Works Committee Rejects Bus Lane Pilot Projectby Ryan McGreal, published May 16, 2013 in Special Report: Light Rail (27 comments)
- Focus on Cycling Infrastructure Before Enforcementby Ryan McGreal, published May 16, 2013 in Special Report: Cycling (3 comments)
- Baranga's On the Beach: This Ain't No Beach-Side Hutby Margaret Lindsay Holton, published May 16, 2013 in Reviews (11 comments)
- NYC Redesigns its Streets for Safety, Vitality and Diverse Useby Ryan McGreal, published May 13, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (19 comments)
- Ghost Crosswalks Haunt Hamilton Intersectionsby Undustrial, published May 12, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (19 comments)
- Public Meeting with New Horizon Regarding City Square Phase 3by Kelly Foyle and Simon Kiss, published May 12, 2013 in Commentary (9 comments)
- Yes We Cannon - Bike Lanes 2015by Justin Jones, published May 10, 2013 in Special Report: Cycling (29 comments)
- City Crackdown on Tactical Urbanismby Ryan McGreal, published May 09, 2013 in Special Report (118 comments)
- Invigorating Tactical Urbanism Talk Inspires Actionby Ryan McGreal, published May 08, 2013 in Events (17 comments)
- Durand Neighbourhood 'Betrayed' By New Horizon Rezoning Applicationby Nicholas Kevlahan, published May 08, 2013 in Commentary (41 comments)
- No One at City Hall is Responding to LRT Criticismby Nicholas Kevlahan, published May 07, 2013 in Special Report: Light Rail (32 comments)
- Re-Tooling Development Charges into a Sharp, Effective Revenue Toolby Cherise Burda, published May 07, 2013 in Commentary (3 comments)
Article Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
- North End Traffic Plan Ribbon Cutting - May 18, 2013, at corner James North and Strachan, just north of the CN tracks
- 18 Upcoming Events...
Recent Blog Entries
- 83-Year-Old Pedestrian Struck at Upper Gage and Mohawkby Ryan McGreal, published May 16, 2013 in Transportation (4 comments)
- Still Struggling to Make Sense of City Policy on Crosswalksby Nicholas Kevlahan, published May 14, 2013 in Transportation (13 comments)
- Tactical Urbanism and the Judgment of Hart Solomonby Nicholas Kevlahan, published May 13, 2013 in Transportation (8 comments)
- A Poem in Julyby Shekar Chandrashekar, published May 12, 2013 in Arts (1 comment)
- Tactical Urbanism Crackdown in Spacingby Ryan McGreal, published May 10, 2013 in Activism (1 comment)
- Hamilton Sustainability Professionals Network Launch Eventby Justin Jones, published May 09, 2013 in Sustainability (0 comments)
- 20 Jackson Demolition Rumour is Just a Rumour - For Nowby Ryan McGreal, published May 09, 2013 in Revitalization (11 comments)
- Staircase Minor Variance Application to Waive Parking Requirementby RTH Staff, published May 08, 2013 in Activism (4 comments)
- Merulla Motion Calls for Integrity Commissioner to Investigate Mayor Bratinaby Ryan McGreal, published May 07, 2013 in Politics (8 comments)
- Letter: In Defence of Ontario Port Landsby Letter to the Editor, published May 07, 2013 in Revitalization (0 comments)
- Mayor Bratina Recuses Himself from Mayors' Vote on Big Move Revenue Toolsby Ryan McGreal, published May 07, 2013 in Light Rail (4 comments)
- Councillor Merulla's Notice of Motion Respecting the Police Services Boardby RTH Staff, published May 03, 2013 in Politics (1 comment)
Blog Archives
By jonathan (registered)
Posted May 23, 2012 at 23:25:35
The first article doesn't specifically address safety as it relates to one-way streets; merely reiterates the well known fact that the safer the road, the better. No arguments there. So...which is safer?
I had to dig for the second article, since the linked url is bad, and the specific article wasn't noted, but found it here: The Journal of the Institution of Engineers Singapore - A Microscopic Simulation Study of Two-Way Street Network VS One-Way Street Network. (Click on the 'Cached' link to the right--the download link goes to the same bad url as the one above). Yep, it's the results of a computer model that indicate pedestrians and cars meet up more often. Not that they're more dangerous, just that there are more of them, because cars have to loop around. It's not even the point of the study--merely a side note on a study showing that one-way streets are faster and more environmentally friendly than two-way.
The third is not an article from a journal, but an opinion paper presented to a symposium, noting no studies, no data analysis, no empirical evidence to support themselves. It also stops short of claiming that two-ways are safer than one-ways, choosing rather to limit itself to the increase in 'potential conflicts' within an interesection. Except that its analysis directly conflicts with one published in 1998 in the Journal of the Institute of Transportation Engineers, which found the number of conflicts of two-way to be at least six times more than one-way. While perhaps not relevant, it is worth noting that the article is written by a private engineering firm with a vested interest in converting one-way streets into two-way streets.
Which brings us to the final article, which has been refuted multiple times by both myself and SpaceMonkey (and, oddly, referenced in the article noted above).
I did, however, find this article interesting: No Two Ways About It: One-Way Streets Are Better than Two-Way.
Now, to be clear, I'm all for converting to two-way, despite the fact that it will make my commute...less than pleasant. But to claim that it's somehow safer than one-way, or that the above article somehow puts the entire issue to bed, is completely false.
Comment edited by jonathan on 2012-05-23 23:28:24
Reply | Permalink | Context