Comment 71540

By Robert D (anonymous) | Posted November 22, 2011 at 14:52:40 in reply to Comment 71510

(1) All projects should be comparable (i.e. let's not compare a rendering to an actual building, or a neighbourhood park "plan".) If you want to give awards to other things, make new categories (i.e. People's choice - Best Commercial Building, People's Choice Best Adaptive Re-Use, People's Choice Best Residential New build"
(2) Maximum 15 nominees for any one award (fewer people to choose from).
(3) Details on the voting website, including multiple pictures that can be enlarged (not thumbnail sized only) and a brief description of the project (I didn't vote because I didn't feel I could make an informed choice with the informatoin they gave me).
(4) More media coverage/attention - The best way to make this more impartial is to increase the number of people voting so the number of impartial voters outweighs the influence of "interested" voters, who have some connection to the project. I think the best way to do this is more media coverage/attention. Let's face it these awards are not well publicized.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds