Comment 70877

By jtford (registered) | Posted October 25, 2011 at 15:14:59

The example cited does not make sense. A non-existent empty lot on hughson and a lot in Ancaster. First, the fee is waived because it is downtown for some reason. Taxpayers should not be picking where in the whole city limits people should live. Second, no doubt the lot in Ancaster has hundreds of other lots to go with it which adds up in fees.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds