Comment 68596

By mystoneycreek (registered) - website | Posted August 29, 2011 at 16:52:26 in reply to Comment 68594

Just the whim of the Ticats at this point.

In fairness (!!!) he explained that to fulfill the requirements of having a stadium at West Harbour (or anywhere, for that matter), there needed to be an 'legacy tenant'.

And the Ti-Cats weren't interested in being that entity.

I'll say this, though: after sitting through today's meeting, when everything has been considered, Hamilton would have been MUCH better off to have gone the velodrome route and left this stadium kerfuffle for someone else.

Comment edited by mystoneycreek on 2011-08-29 17:14:52

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds