Comment 68482

By WH (anonymous) | Posted August 27, 2011 at 10:25:47 in reply to Comment 68481

Shouldn't they have done their due diligence when they presented the renovate option way back when? They only site that was ever thoroughly examined for cost was the west harbour which was the one that was voted for SEVEN times. Everything else was done on the fly, on the back of a napkin. Also, how is it possible that the price will stay the same if they have to build new? That statement undermines the credibility of this whole IWS2 process and at the very least, makes a new stadium on the West Harbour in the same ballpark of costs. Which begs the question: At this point, given that construction will not start for another until Fall 2012, why not revisit the west harbour site?

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds