-
Yes We Cannon!
Join the Movement and Spread the Word
Recent Articles
- We Need to Remember the Case for LRTby Ryan McGreal, published May 21, 2013 in Special Report: Light Rail (8 comments)
- The Benefits of Urban Chicken and Bee Pilot Projects at Community Gardensby Joseph Sneep, published May 18, 2013 in Commentary (12 comments)
- Public Works Committee Rejects Bus Lane Pilot Projectby Ryan McGreal, published May 16, 2013 in Special Report: Light Rail (31 comments)
- Focus on Cycling Infrastructure Before Enforcementby Ryan McGreal, published May 16, 2013 in Special Report: Cycling (5 comments)
- Baranga's On the Beach: This Ain't No Beach-Side Hutby Margaret Lindsay Holton, published May 16, 2013 in Reviews (11 comments)
- NYC Redesigns its Streets for Safety, Vitality and Diverse Useby Ryan McGreal, published May 13, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (19 comments)
- Ghost Crosswalks Haunt Hamilton Intersectionsby Undustrial, published May 12, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (19 comments)
- Public Meeting with New Horizon Regarding City Square Phase 3by Kelly Foyle and Simon Kiss, published May 12, 2013 in Commentary (10 comments)
- Yes We Cannon - Bike Lanes 2015by Justin Jones, published May 10, 2013 in Special Report: Cycling (29 comments)
- City Crackdown on Tactical Urbanismby Ryan McGreal, published May 09, 2013 in Special Report (121 comments)
- Invigorating Tactical Urbanism Talk Inspires Actionby Ryan McGreal, published May 08, 2013 in Events (17 comments)
- Durand Neighbourhood 'Betrayed' By New Horizon Rezoning Applicationby Nicholas Kevlahan, published May 08, 2013 in Commentary (41 comments)
Article Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
- Mental Health for a diverse Hamilton - May 23, 2013, at Crowne Plaza Hotel, 150 King Street East
- 19 Upcoming Events...
Recent Blog Entries
- A Trip Down Highway 6by Ryan McGreal, published May 21, 2013 in Transportation (14 comments)
- 83-Year-Old Pedestrian Struck at Upper Gage and Mohawkby Ryan McGreal, published May 16, 2013 in Transportation (6 comments)
- Still Struggling to Make Sense of City Policy on Crosswalksby Nicholas Kevlahan, published May 14, 2013 in Transportation (14 comments)
- Tactical Urbanism and the Judgment of Hart Solomonby Nicholas Kevlahan, published May 13, 2013 in Transportation (8 comments)
- A Poem in Julyby Shekar Chandrashekar, published May 12, 2013 in Arts (1 comment)
- Tactical Urbanism Crackdown in Spacingby Ryan McGreal, published May 10, 2013 in Activism (1 comment)
- Hamilton Sustainability Professionals Network Launch Eventby Justin Jones, published May 09, 2013 in Sustainability (0 comments)
- 20 Jackson Demolition Rumour is Just a Rumour - For Nowby Ryan McGreal, published May 09, 2013 in Revitalization (11 comments)
- Staircase Minor Variance Application to Waive Parking Requirementby RTH Staff, published May 08, 2013 in Activism (4 comments)
- Merulla Motion Calls for Integrity Commissioner to Investigate Mayor Bratinaby Ryan McGreal, published May 07, 2013 in Politics (8 comments)
- Letter: In Defence of Ontario Port Landsby Letter to the Editor, published May 07, 2013 in Revitalization (0 comments)
- Mayor Bratina Recuses Himself from Mayors' Vote on Big Move Revenue Toolsby Ryan McGreal, published May 07, 2013 in Light Rail (4 comments)
Blog Archives
By misterque (registered) - website
Posted July 14, 2011 at 18:58:56 in reply to Comment 66177
I am not ignoring anything. I am an advocate of safe efficient roads. We chose a building near major arteries with onsite parking. I have no delusions nor the intention of stopping people from driving. Our buildings are bike commuter friendly. When our 'bike fence' is removed we will make sure to have a good bike rack on site. We would love to see people walking along Dundurn and King more.
I remember listening to talk radio in Vancouver with people saying that the taxes would sky rocket, that criminals would pour into the city, that the money should go to a bridge, or wider highways. On the other hand others said that the Skybus was being put in for 'developers to make money' and would lead to terrible things like increased density, and destroy the environment. The reality is always somewhere in between the rhetoric. LRT will not save Hamilton from idiots, and it will not bankrupt the city either. I think that supporting LRT is worth the risk.
In 1986 Vancouver's population was no where near 2.5 million. Loosely looking at Vancouver's proportional population, length of track, and style of construction, Hamilton's LRT investment is comparable for the smaller city that Hamilton represents. Metrolinx does not intend to bankrupt Hamilton, the lion's share of the capital will come from Metrolinx, and the ongoing cost of operating the system cannot conceivably increase our taxes by 20%. If it does and we don't want it anymore you can pave it in, and just deal with the amortization payments. To date no city has done this with their rapid transit system in the last 50 years.
I appreciate your concern for The Staircase. Nothing lasts forever. I have seen this little theatre survive SARS IĀ and SARS II, The Ecoli outbreak, Gulf Invasion Two, 911, Afghan Invasion, the snowpocalypse, World's Bike Race, the Great Black Out, Walkerton, the Dot Com correction, the Depression of 2009, etc. These kinds of things keep people indoors, regardless of cars, LRT or bikes. So much of how people act has to do with perception, LRT is good for perception, it will help this city specifically, and I hope you can trust my experience and judgement that the risk is worth it.
If the tax burden does become too much it will likely be from increased property values of a blossoming city. Hopefully you can manage to stay here if that happens. The Staircase needs every customer (biking, hiking, driving, hopping, train riding) it can get.
Reply | Permalink | Context
:)hUe