Comment 65796

By Iam Exasperated (anonymous) | Posted July 08, 2011 at 06:12:48

Collins and Clark did not indicate any opposition to LRT.

They raised concerns about the nodes and corridor planning process.

Clark asked why all corridors were not being studied as a whole as toronto did in their heralded "avenues study" , VALID QUESTION

They asked why not james, centennial, (for go transit) and rymal (where dev is already jumping ahead of corridor) . VALID QUESTION

Clark expressed frustrations at LRT trumping good planning processes in the rest of city. VALID POINT

Collins asked why staff were proceeding with nodes and corridor planning without councillors setting principles , standards ? VALID QUESTION

Clark also asked for an accounting of the $3million. VALID QUESTION

Later on CHML Clark objected to the councillors private mtgs with the staff for LRT updates arguing that the public has a right to hear the Q&A . VALID POINT

HMMM, do you want to play a game?

IMAGINE we are discussing a super highway propsal... would you be attacking Clark and Collins for raising their concerns?

NO, you wouldn't!

so RYAN , maybe you should apologize for taking valid questions out of context and ramping up an email call to action blitz for nothing. My old man says RTH just took a serious body blow to their credibility......sorry but I agree



Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds