Recent Articles
- Designing a Network of Neighbourhood Greenwaysby Jason Leach, published June 19, 2013 in Special Report: Cycling (6 comments)
- Enthusiasm, Concern about 220 Dundurn South Redevelopmentby Jason Allen, published June 18, 2013 in Commentary (11 comments)
- It's Oh So Quietby Ryan McGreal, published June 14, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (15 comments)
- A Complete Streets Policy for Hamiltonby Sara Mayo, published June 13, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (15 comments)
- Devil in the Details of 220 Dundurn South Redevelopmentby Jason Allen, published June 12, 2013 in Commentary (34 comments)
- Pedestrian Use Triples After Crosswalk Installedby Ryan McGreal, published June 10, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (7 comments)
- MacNab Conversion an Opportunity for Better Walkabilityby Jason Leach, published June 10, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (13 comments)
- City Bolsters Crosswalks at Multiple Locationsby Ryan McGreal, published June 07, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (23 comments)
- Documentary Video Explains Dundas EcoParkby Ryan McGreal, published June 07, 2013 in Feature (1 comment)
- Neighbourhood Greenways for Hamiltonby Jason Leach, published June 06, 2013 in Special Report: Cycling (30 comments)
- An Unnecessary Evil: Transportation in the GTHAby Adrian Duyzer, published June 06, 2013 in Opinion (20 comments)
- Hamilton 'Must' Convert Streets Back to Two-Way: Architectsby Ryan McGreal, published May 31, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (88 comments)
Article Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
- World Refugee Day in Hamilton - June 20, 2013, at Hamilton Central Library, 55 York Boulevard, Hamilton, ON
- 12 Upcoming Events...
Recent Blog Entries
- Lockdown, Arrests After Pellet Gun Shots at St. Joseph's Schoolby RTH Staff, published June 19, 2013 in News (2 comments)
- MacNab Two-Way Conversion in Operationby Rob Fiedler, published June 19, 2013 in Transportation (4 comments)
- Enjoy Gore While it Lastsby Chris Erskine, published June 19, 2013 in Architecture (7 comments)
- Hamilton Hometown Loveby Ryan McGreal, published June 19, 2013 in Media (5 comments)
- The 'Efficiency' of a One-Way Street Gridby Sean Burak, published June 18, 2013 in Transportation (6 comments)
- Enjoying the Gore Park Promenadeby Ryan McGreal, published June 14, 2013 in Revitalization (10 comments)
- What if RTH Turned Comments into Letters to the Editor?by Larry Pattison, published June 14, 2013 in Site Notes (12 comments)
- 83-Year-Old Pedestrian Dies from Injuries After Collisionby Ryan McGreal, published June 13, 2013 in Transportation (7 comments)
- Hamilton Tactical Urbanism in TreeHuggerby Ryan McGreal, published June 12, 2013 in Activism (1 comment)
- Another Rapid Transit Manager Leaves Cityby Ryan McGreal, published June 10, 2013 in Light Rail (6 comments)
- Best Practices for Protected Bike Lanesby Jason Leach, published June 10, 2013 in Transportation (5 comments)
- Hume Tells Hamilton to Start Thinking Like a Cityby Ryan McGreal, published June 10, 2013 in Revitalization (27 comments)
Blog Archives
By MonkeyDo (anonymous) | Posted February 20, 2011 at 16:22:07
The Federal Government sold the building to Vranich for $1.2M with a covanent to ensure he wouldn't raise the building, or destroy the heritage elements. The price of the sale was determined based on these elements being preserved - which means they were assigned a value. While they may not have been given a dollar value - they were given a cultural value. Since the Federal government was relieving itself of the maintenance of these items it was willing to give the building owner a deal on the asset provided he/she maintained the culturally significant items for all to enjoy.
I have been given a tour of the building and the internal items noted in the covanent no longer exist to my recollection. The freizes on the outside have been left to rot for years and are in the worst condition since their installation in the 1950s. The owner has requested the right to tear down the building. If this final requests moves forward he will have broken every covanent in the agreement with the Federal government.
Is this emblematic of how all contracts with the Federal government are enforced?
Are there any other buildings in our community that are governed by similar covanents?
I would argue that the owner is in a breach of contract scenario and the Feds should demand the building back. The Feds should buy it back from him for the cost he paid less the decreased value in the asset now that he has ripped out every piece of recycleable metal, countless windows, HVAC, internal heritage elements as noted in the covanent, and now doubt countless other issues.
This would bring the building value down under $1M and I would personally guarantee that the community could raise the funds to buy the building from the Feds and to renovate it into a truly mixed use facility for the community - housing, services, creative industry space, commercial and retail.
There is now reason we should accept shit developments in our core any more. As noted by so many people if Vranich needs an empty lots he can use the HMP as promised or deal with his burnt out building at King and Hess.
We simply shouldn't stand for this crap. Where is our Federal government? Who is representing us in this dialogue?
Jeremy
Reply | Permalink | Context