Comment 57644

By mystoneycreek (registered) - website | Posted January 23, 2011 at 23:02:00

Q: "BTW it shouldn't be $45 million, it should be $35 million. Didn't the city spend $10 million already?"

A: "You are corrrect. But some councillors and some staff continue to talk about a $45 million contribution. In my books, we already spent $10 million trying to satisfy the Cats. Moreover, the original plan showed the City spending $5 million from the sale of IW lands. So, we are short $15 million because of this new plan."


Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools