Comment 56958

By Ezaki Glico (anonymous) | Posted January 19, 2011 at 06:47:50

I should add that, as has been suggested, the proposed 4-5 minute headway between vehicles (rather than the 15-30 minute headway currently in place between MUMC and Eastgate or the 10-15 minute headway in place elsewhere on the route) would shift the playing field considerably. The degree of advantage depends on how many trains the city loads into the circuit -- a 4-5 min headway would mean 12-15 trains travelling on that 62-minute loop, if my math is correct.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools