Comment 55990

By Zephyr (registered) | Posted January 12, 2011 at 12:17:21

@mrjanitor,

The reason for the 25,000 business plan is that the Ti-Cats were to be a legacy tenant for the stadium and were to contribute to the cost of expanding the stadium from what was required for the PanAm games. The expansion to accomodate the Ti-Cats was only a "nice to have" as confirmed by Ian Troop.

Changing the business plan to a 6,000 seat stadium fulfills the PanAm game mandate (amateur athletics legacy) nicely and is indeed what other communities are proposing to the PanAm committee as a contingency in case Hamilton fails to find an acceptable solution. As again confirmed by Ian Troop the cost savings in building a smaller stadium could be put towards building a permanent velodrome.

If the Ti-Cats find some money to contribute to this project, they can find themselves at the negotiating table as a partner. Right now whether we choose the IWS site of the WH site, they are merely a corporate welfare recipient.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds