Comment 54223

By wentworthst (anonymous) | Posted January 01, 2011 at 16:00:36

@TomRobertson wrote...
"Property taxes collected once Ivor Wynne is sold would cover stadium upkeep costs."

Sorry to disagree, but from a Ward 3 POV, that's a sunny statement I wish I could believe.

Ivor Wynne isn't something you just toss up on Realtor.ca, in hopes someone has an interest in an 80 year-old stadium (with no tenents, currently a low-income area).

My top question during the election for Ward 3 candidates was:

"What will happen to Ivor Wynne if the Ti-Cats leave?"

Our biggest fear here is we watch it become yet another boarded up property. And, for the record, I didn't hear a single answer for that area that will not cost taxpayers $10+ million...

Comment edited by wentworthst on 2011-01-01 16:02:04

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds