Comment 50706

By Kiely (registered) | Posted October 28, 2010 at 11:19:31

While it is good to look at Mr. Bratina's past, (Thank-you Ryan), I see a potential problem with his future. As shown in the Spectator's votes by ward breakdown Bob Bratina is now beholden to suburban interests. They likely elected him because he raised the spectre of de-amalgamation. They don't care about his pro-downtown stance because as they see it if they can push the de-amalgamation agenda then downtown Hamilton is no longer their problem and Bob Bratina can go right on being a "progressive Mayor who supports downtown".

He will be held to task by the suburban/rural voters that elected him and if he wants to hold on to the Mayor's job (and once in power no one wants to lose it) he will have to pander to them. If people thought a debate about where to put a stadium sucked up council's time and effort just wait for the great de-amalgamation debate.

Mr. Bratina may have some silver lining but to me his cons still outweigh the pros… especially when considering how and why he got elected.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds