Comment 50649

By Pxtl (registered) - website | Posted October 27, 2010 at 14:50:38

@Clay Shentrup

IRV has its flaws, but I don't think anybody argues that it is worse than FPTP. Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. But yes, while approval voting lacks granularity of control for the voter, but it is simple and clear for the voter to understand not only how they are voting but the math behind the calculation.

Alternately, I'd support some sort of "limited-proportional" subset of council. Simply a body with, say, 8 votes, apportioned out to the top N mayoral candidates. So in this vote, we'd see Bratina as mayor with 4 votes, and DiIanni and Eisenberger each sporting 2. This would give the Mayoral candidates (who are far better understood by the public) a stronger voice in council and reduce the spoiler-candidate issue as well.

So I'd go with Approval voting in the Ward-levels, and the above system of proportional-representation system that lets the Mayor (and mayoral-councillors) have more power in council.

Obviously, I'm talking out of my ass and spitballing ideas as I go.

Comment edited by Pxtl on 2010-10-27 13:51:54

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds