Comment 48299

By Tartan Triton (anonymous) | Posted September 27, 2010 at 11:31:26

Assuming the author is coming from a consensus viewpoint or has all of the relevant facts in hand, subjective journalism may be great. In any debate where you're the righteous outlier (the Red Hill battle springs to mind) or where the journalist lacks additional facts that would substantially recontextualize things, the math may not be so simple or favourable. For some reason I think of a scene in the ’80s film Witness, where Amish elder Eli Lapp schools young Jacob Lapp about guns and homicide:

Jacob: I would only kill the bad man.
Eli: Only the bad man. I see. And you know these bad men by sight? You are able to look into their hearts and see this badness?

Although there's one chap quoted, there are other discordant notes to the paper’s Supercrawl coverage (the irony of a Toyota lot in a car free zone is another that's mentioned; the tetchy “public space” sticker campaign was not), but since the Spec also dedicated significant resources to the street (eg. the SmartLife history lessons), gave substantial pre-weekend ink to the event and has generally been a zestful cheerleader for all things James North, newsworthy, maybe we can learn to ignore the pea under the mattress.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds