Comment 47795

By nobrainer (registered) | Posted September 16, 2010 at 11:55:38

Basically, since the Ticats haven't offered to contribute any money, why do we even care what they think about where we end up spending all the money to pay for a 25,000 seat stadium? Why does HostCo insist that the Ticats are the only valid "legacy tenant" anyway? How viable are they really as a legacy tenant if they're only an owner's willingness to run annual losses away from bankruptcy?

Comment edited by nobrainer on 2010-09-16 10:56:07

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds