Comment 46761

By mystoneycreek (registered) - website | Posted August 30, 2010 at 18:51:16

OK.

Before we deify Mr. Chamberlain...more importantly, before we start getting all positively blustery about what he’s suggesting, here’s some stuff that I think needs to be considered:

-What is the extent of subsidies for the innovation park? I’m thinking of unsuspecting taxpayers inputting into creating inventions that are profited by innovation licensing companies...the benefits of which do not filter back to the tax payers.

-Has Mr. Chamberlain yet delivered on prosperity after spending nearly 800K on attempting to invent a new language for the city? 

-His licensing firm (a fairly new invention) promptly got a nice location in the heart of the invention zone; does he get first dibs to license the technologies?

-Why would a licensing company need physical proximity to tech R&D centre? 

-Are there good reasons why a company like Chamberlain’s would get upset at the reduction -or now dispersal- of startup companies across the city (ideally) or in this case maybe to the waterfront?

-What are the specific terms of agrement for the licensing of Mac technologies by Travaris? Is it sole-sourced to Travaris? or are there other companies involved in the deal?

-Has he in fact empowered Mayor Fred in some way to take the hard stand that he took on WH?

Enquiring minds SHOULD be wanting to know the answers here, before we grant tremendous cachet to Mr. Chamberlain’s observations.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds