Comment 46655

By realfreeenterpriser (registered) | Posted August 30, 2010 at 11:52:44

Mister Underscore is being downvoted because he writes things that are factually incorrect as the rationale for slagging the Mayor like "From the very beginning, this should have been about following a process and collaboratively developing a plan for successful Pan Am facilities". Which, of course, is exactly what the City did in the first place and HAD to do in order to win the bid.

How on earth could that be considered a "good argument"?

It's perfectly acceptable to go on this site and say you've got a chubby for the Mayor. But if you attempt to justify that with something that simply couldn't, and of course didn't, happen then expect to get downvoted.

Comment edited by realfreeenterpriser on 2010-08-30 10:53:54

Reply | Permalink | Context

You must be logged in to vote on this comment.

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Site Tools

Feeds