Comment 46474

By Uh oh (anonymous) | Posted August 27, 2010 at 15:49:46

Sorry Ryan:

"I mean the city has decisively chosen the West Harbour despite, you know, there are certain issue, like any location will have certain issues that have to be overcome."

That about sums it up. West Harbour is not a good site, and those "certain issues" to be overcome are significant infringements on the quality of life of residents surrounding the stadium.

Terpstra states this quite clearly, and you do not, have never, addressed this issue. I empathise with all your arguments about the problems of suburban locations and the way political factions have played the game, but your game was in trouble early on when the short list included only one downtown location that was so bad that it made any on the list of suburban locations look half decent in comparison. And you took the bait. Now the best option is that nothing be built, with the possible loss of the TiCats a bonus. That is beginning to look very much like municipal progress to me.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds