Comment 29353

By A Smith (anonymous) | Posted March 05, 2009 at 14:53:09

Ryan, you're just frustrated because you realize that the boom period you were referring to (1950-69) was actually a period of small government. The numbers clearly show that non military spending was about half of what it is today, military spending was double and this ratio of spending produced twenty years of strong economic growth. Nor can you dispute the fact that when Chretien, Harris and Clinton cut social spending, those economies took off as well.

Just admit that you have zero clue what makes for strong growth, because if you did, you wouldn't have talked about supporting Bob Rae. Here's another unscientific correlation for you...

Bob Rae's economic policies = Worst economic performance in recent history.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds