Comment 27663

By Robert_D (anonymous) | Posted December 02, 2008 at 09:11:52

While I usually think that dissenting and opening old arguments once a course of action has been decided is nothing but divisive and problematic, oftentimes just delaying the inevitable, I cannot disagree with at least looking at this.

Usually I find such tactics are used purposefully by one individual with "sour grapes" trying to protest the way the majority has already decided on going. But that doesn't appear to be the case here. This is a suggestion which, I don't believe (although I may be mistaken) was ever really considered the first time around. When you consider the financial situation of the city and the economy in general (and I hate using that as a catch all excuse, but it really is something we should all be aware of) I think this at least deserves to be considered.

Best of luck to Bratina in convincing the rest of council, and in finding someone to take over old city hall.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds