Comment 1606

By (anonymous) | Posted October 20, 2006 at 08:27:03

The commentary, as usual, is bang on. The lands have been designated for industrial purposes since the mid 1960s. that is how you create the vacant land until the market catches up with employment projects. So now the argument is that there are no developers wanting to develop the lands for employment purposes. Hello? Didn't I just say this has been planned for industry and it has sequentially occurred from west to east and more recently from the QEW frontage southerly.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds