Comment 122617

By Locke (registered) | Posted March 20, 2018 at 10:02:29 in reply to Comment 122611

Just because the builder has 4 sites downtown doesn't mean they will be developed. Look at Vranich sat on property downtown for years and years and years. Also, it's hard to argue about accuracy when you suggest 32 instead of 30 stories when the proposal is for a 40 story tower. And in terms of a 43-storey building 60 seconds down Main St... is that speeding down Main St at 60km/h through a green wave of lights and what does that have to do with a building on 'this' site, raised up on the top of an ancient sandbar? As I said, I've no real problem with breaking the 30-story limit closer to King and James, but I do believe the cities thought of limiting to 30 stories for now is a good plan for overall development. Of course, this limit could be reviewed and revised in a decade or two if demand continues.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds