Comment 120574

By Deleted User (anonymous) | Posted January 12, 2017 at 19:46:16

Predicted October 26 in Comment 120355:

"... The James St spur will not be built."

And I know it was the cost. "Capital expense" according to Ryan. Hmmm. You seemed to overlook that before.

Funny thing is that now Ryan is framing this like he was secretly against it the whole time. " Supercrawl supported the spur right on this forum when I pointed out that it would interfere with the annual event. I wonder what they think now? I'll bet they'll also be excited for the "cost-effective alternative." This thing is turning into the biggest joke of all time.

Comment edited by JimC on 2017-01-12 19:46:50

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds