Comment 119402

By kevlahan (registered) | Posted June 16, 2016 at 11:39:21 in reply to Comment 119397

Basically, you are saying only opponents who believe they will be harmed by LRT should be heard. In your various posts you have tried to discredit the opinions of:

  1. Supporters who live near the line because they will benefit directly.

  2. Those who don't live near the line because they won't be affected.

  3. Businesses that believe they stand to gain from LRT.

  4. Business people who are starting new businesses, especially those who are starting new businesses in the immediate area of the line. They are clearly voting with their time and money!

  5. Anyone who might make an (indirect) profit from LRT even though you've also claimed that LRT won't provide any significant economic benefit (where is the profit coming from?).

Combined with just making stuff up about a facebook anti-LRT page (there is no evidence at all of the majority of businesses along the line supporting them!) fraudulent logos (a very serious charge by an anonymous commenter based on nothing), about how construction will proceed and how long it will take and people losing their homes and jobs.

You sound just like Ron Berenbaum, who has been writing misleading letters attacking LRT to the Spec since 2014 (as well as opposing traffic calming and two way conversion) for many years. Maybe you are related?

Comment edited by kevlahan on 2016-06-16 11:43:33

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds