Comment 119239

By feldercarb (registered) | Posted June 10, 2016 at 08:58:59

Supposedly, this was studied and planned. However the "approved" plan includes a stub on James that wasn't studied. And doesn't run as far east as was studied.

So "some" studies are good, and some are not. It all seems politically expedient, rather than well planned.

So the door seems open to "some" changes, but not others. If the gov. is free to make up a stub on James, why not change from King to Main or vice-versa?

What I don't get : why not run tracks in one direction on one street, and tracks in opposite direction on another street. Kitchener-Waterloo is doing this in several places on there project. I realize the electrical service costs more, but it leaves more room on the street.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds