Comment 118334

By kevlahan (registered) | Posted May 06, 2016 at 11:34:24 in reply to Comment 118332

Exactly. I can disagree with a decision, but still accept that it is democratically legitimate. This happens all the time.

It is quite different to disagree with a political decision and claim it is democratically illegitimate.

For example, the 1988 federal election was clearly over free trade, and most reasonable critics of free trade agreed that Mulroney won a mandate to pursue free trade by winning the election (especially as the two anti-free trade parties got 46.8% of the vote combined compared with 50% for the Conservatives).

On the other hand, I felt that Bratina's opposition to LRT was democratically illegitimate since he campaigned on a strong pro-LRT platform and never gave any convincing reasons for changing his position, especially as no facts about LRT had changed in the month or so it took him to switch positions.

Comment edited by kevlahan on 2016-05-06 11:39:03

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds