Comment 117099

By highasageorgiapine (registered) | Posted March 21, 2016 at 16:25:59 in reply to Comment 117051

you seem to enjoy personally insulting people in comments for no particular reason, which is unpleasant and detracts from productive conversation. please discontinue doing so.

the point i was making, which you seemed to completely miss, is that regardless of the outcome of this appeal the options for alternate transit to the hgh general site are poor and there will be little incentive for individuals to change their behaviour. it's great that the blight of another parking lot is avoided, but the cars that would have parked here are going to be parking on side streets or in other lots in the area unless the city actually develops the infrastructure to support getting workers to and from this area efficiently

developing good transit is seen as a strategy for drawing businesses and workers to an area, so i don't really see how it is merely the problem of hgh that the public and active transit options in that area are poor. a large institution like hgh, that employs people across different skill and education profiles with high paying careers, is a great asset to the community. providing good active and public transit options will draw people to not only work there, but also to consider hamilton as a place to live and raise a family. integrating the west harbour go into any service enhancements could be a good draw also if the timings were worked out well. when you have actual good transit then you can start with to incentivize its use as suggested earlier

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds