Comment 114684

By kevlahan (registered) | Posted November 06, 2015 at 10:42:13 in reply to Comment 114683

I'm not sure: at some points it is seems wider than 1.2 m (e.g. the third figure).

However, possibly combined with a slightly wider road allowance, it could have been enough to make a bike lane or a sidewalk on one side.

The point is that sidewalks or bike lanes were not even considered. But they did widen the road enough to add this "buffer" region for vehicles, which likely has the effect of increasing speeds.

Comment edited by kevlahan on 2015-11-06 11:44:51

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds