There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By CharlesBall (registered) | Posted October 13, 2015 at 17:45:13 in reply to Comment 114251
OK, I'll bite.
I think you are looking at the green line in the Hamilton report (the commuting numbers) and not the real numbers or the red numbers in the graph.
In 2011 there were 7 pedestrian road deaths in Ottawa. http://ottawa.ca/en/2011-ottawa-road-saf... Their population was about 880,000. So Hamilton is 6/520000 or just over 1.15 per 100000. Ottawa is 7/880000 or just .79 per 100000. You could say that Hamilton’s rate is 1.45 times the size of Ottawa’s rate or even more dramatically that Ottawa’s rate is only 68.6% of that of Hamilton’s or even more dramatically still that Hamilton’s rate is 45% greater than Ottawa’s.
But what does that mean? In real numbers, out of 520,000 people living and walking in Hamilton, 6 died in car accidents. Out of 880,000 people in Ottawa, 7 died in car accidents. These are not large numbers. 138 people out of 13.7 million people die in Ontario as pedestrians in accidents with cars every year. That is 1 out of 100,000. Given all the numbers in real, not percentage terms, Hamilton is just slightly over and Ottawa is just slightly under the provincial average rate per 100000. If Hamilton had one less death and Ottawa had one more death Hamilton would be under the provincial average and Ottawa would be almost at the provincial average and their two numbers would be the same on a per 100000 basis (.96 and .9 respectively.) When you are talking about such small numbers, there is nothing of statistical significance to be gleaned by talking in terms of percentages. The real numbers are just too small. In any given year they will likely vary by too great an amount to draw any meaningful conclusions from them other than that some years are more dangerous than others. In fact, just choosing per hundred thousandths and putting them into one year slots does not help much. On the injury side, it is impossible to gauge the true societal significance of the rate because we do not know the degree to which the pedestrians were injured. Simply saying that any number of people would not be injured doesn’t help us understand the immensity of the problem. We do know historically, looking at accident and death rates since the invention of the automobile, that overall, over time, the danger has been decreasing until it has nearly plateaued and the safety has been increasing until it has nearly plateaued.
No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be? George Orwell
Permalink | Context