Comment 111475

By notsurprised (anonymous) | Posted May 09, 2015 at 09:30:40

"The owner blocked off a portion of the property with curb stops and was permitted an access lane to be used for vehicle movement only to assist with the stacked parking of cars being more easily manoeuvered. We felt this to be a reasonable compromise given there was no net increase in parking spaces and only created more efficient movements"

Why do we need to compromise on a law that is designed to limit senseless demolition. Why have the law at all, if you're not going to make it effective? It is the thin edge of the wedge to illegal parking lot operation , which the operators have brazenly done. The order should be to block off the entire footprint or we start piling on the fines.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds