Lister Block

The Greenest Building Already Exists

By Natalie Bull
Published July 26, 2006

The greenest building is the one that already exists. The Lister Block decision has environmental and heritage implications.

Heritage conservation advocates and environmental activists - those who care not only about the planet, but also about the quality of our built environment - should both be watching the case of the 1923 Lister Block in Hamilton with bated breath. This is a textbook case of why governments at all levels need to do more than just talk about their commitment to the environment.

In 2000, a revitalization deal for the heritage designated Lister Block fell apart when the federal government instead spurred the construction of Canada Place, a new building.

The Auditor General recently noted that the leasing deal may end up costing tax payers $13 million dollars more than it needed to, but let's talk about the cost to the environment.

While the Lister Block, a massive source of embodied energy, sits deteriorating, construction of the new building resulted in the use of resources and the production of greenhouse gasses to process and transport building materials.

This scenario threatens to be repeated. The City of Hamilton agreed to occupy three floors of the Lister Block, but recently claimed that the building does not meet its leasing standards, preventing its reuse. The alternative is complete demolition and construction of a replica in its place, with token retention of bits and pieces of the original heritage building.

In addition to the environmental impact, which would now include landfill created by demolition, is the loss of the cultural capital of Hamilton's oldest retail/office complex.

This is not an isolated incident, because governments at all levels are failing to walk the talk:

  1. In 2003, the former Eaton's Department Store in Winnipeg, a 1904 landmark, was demolished to make way for an entertainment complex that received $38.5 million in public funding, including $12 million in funding from the federal government.

  2. In 2004, the Salmoni Building in Amherstburg, Ontario, was demolished despite public protests and reports confirming the building's viability for reuse.

  3. Earlier this year, the City of Kitchener sent the designated Forsyth Factory to the landfill instead of incorporating it into a new central library development.

While a demolition permit has already been approved for the Lister Block, the provincial minister of culture has intervened and the City has agreed to a 60 day cooling-off period for stakeholders and experts to work with a provincial facilitator.

This time-out gives the City of Hamilton an opportunity to show that its environmental policy is worth more than the paper it is written on. By making its future tenancy in the Lister Block conditional on retention and re-use of the heritage building, the City would make a meaningful step toward environmental stewardship, and help create a market demand for office space in an authentic historic building.

If all governments gave priority to existing designated buildings in their space leasing and property acquisition decisions, it would result in a huge and sustained market transformation.

Natalie Bull is the Executive Director of the Heritage Canada Foundation. She is happiest when doing porch repairs or glazing windows at her 1840s farmhouse in New Brunswick, which was saved from demolition by her first act of heritage activism.

1 Comment

View Comments: Nested | Flat

Read Comments

[ - ]

By salmoni building (anonymous) | Posted March 05, 2007 at 00:28:31

Congradulations to amherstburg town council for having given the go ahead to demolish the largest heritage building in the town.Our waterfront is now greatly improved with the new salmoni building which was always proudly refered to as The Navy Yard Building.You have even managed to wipe out the name of it.We espeacially like all the original limestone the owner re-used as part of the ploy to sell it to the people that the building would have some authenticity(not one was put back)Lets be honest the previous owner who had applied for residential units on the 2nd&3rd floors and was turned down would have had a legitimate law suit, had the current owner used the original building.It was much easier to avoid litigation and demolish eliminating that possibility than to chance another Gordon House debacle.So now you have a brand new shiny building to attract the tourists instead of the original one that had all that terrible history that went along with it.To think of all the hassle the previous owner went through whenever they wanted to pound a nail in it,and all along all they wanted to do was have what you have now.Had they been granted residential permits the building would never had sat empty for 15 years and would definitly still be standing anchoring the heritage theme to the town the waterfront and the NAVY YARD PARK and the town would not feel obligated to spend 4 million dollars changing the park.Perhaps they can take all the ruble from the old Navy Yard building and pile it inside the repossesed hull of the HMS Detroit and display it off the new $4,000,000 Salmoni island. Thank you. Anonymous for fear of another tax increase.

Permalink | Context

View Comments: Nested | Flat

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to comment.

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds