History

Battle of Stoney Creek, 2011

By Michael Cumming
Published June 06, 2011

Every year in Stoney Creek, Ontario for the last 30 years, people have reenacted the Battle of Stoney Creek.

Reenactors on the British side at the Battle of Stoney Creek (Image Credit: Michael Cumming)
Reenactors on the British side at the Battle of Stoney Creek (Image Credit: Michael Cumming)

This was a small but pivotal battle between the Americans and the British during the War of 1812. The British at the time were a great European power while the US were destined to become a great North American power.

The Americans were just establishing their nationhood, their standing army and their military capability. The British, on the other hand, had one of the most professional and disciplined armies in the world.

The War of 1812 is usually portrayed as a battle between two settler nations: the British (helped by Canadian militias and its native allies) and the Americans. Later in the 19th century, both the Americans and the British did rather well for themselves.

The natives were of essential help in helping the British defend itself against the American invasion. They knew the land much more intimately than the British. Their keen sense of how to survive in the northern woods was honed by thousands of years of settlement. Their dwellings and clothing appear the most suitable for warfare in northern forests. They were also known as fierce and skillful warriors who could terrorize their enemies.

Yet, as the actor portraying Chief Tecumseh at the reenactment explained, the native side did less well as result of the war than the British or the Americans.

Despite their help in helping the British not to lose the war, the natives were the only side that can be said to have 'lost' this war: their traditional way of life, their political autonomy, and their hold on their territory was soon to be greatly diminished by the influx of mostly white settlers.

Southern Ontario and in particular the Niagara region, then as now, was an attractive target of invasion: a fruit-belt with a mild climate, with important centres of population, adjacent to impressive lakes and other natural waterways and with some of the most productive farmland in the region.

As luck would have it, the War of 1812 was a draw and residents of Upper Canada remained British, later Canadian. As a result of the War of 1812, most of the current eastern boundaries between Canada and the US were defined.

Therefore, one of the war's outcomes was the establishment of a stable frontier between two large countries. This has given the lands on either side of the border many years in which the inhabitants didn't have to worry too much about the possibility of external invasion or other political or military calamities. Most other regions of the world cannot claim such stability of their frontiers so early in their political history.

This was a type of 'peace dividend' for the region, which unfortunately did not extend to its aboriginal population. Their history after this war was one of increasing marginalization - rather than stability and growth.

The reverberations of this process of marginalization are still felt strongly in the region and have yet to be addressed adequately on either side of the border.

First published in Michael's blog.

Michael Cumming is a designer, writer and photographer concerned about sustainable design and urban development. He has training in Architecture and Computational Design and has lived in several cities in Canada, the US and Europe. He is delighted to have settled with his wife and two children in the Strathcona neighbourhood of Hamilton. You can view his website or follow him on Twitter.

4 Comments

View Comments: Nested | Flat

Read Comments

[ - ]

By mystoneycreek (registered) - website | Posted June 06, 2011 at 14:32:02

There's a minor dust-up unfolding over the 'legend of Billy Green' and the role he played in the Battle of Stoney Creek. I've posted about it on my blog: http://mystoneycreek.blogspot.com/2011/0...

Great things are being planned for the bicentennial of the Battle in 2013; whether or not this issue is settled to anyone's satisfaction by then is beyond my powers of prescience.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By Undustrial (registered) - website | Posted June 06, 2011 at 15:24:25

For their help defending British borders in the war of 1812, the Six Nations were granted the Haldimand tract lining the Grand River, giving them a very large swath of modern-day Ontario. This was very important, since the Six Nations spanned the border, and lost a very large chunk of their American territory for siding against the US. Under Chief Joseph Brant (who succeeded Tecumseh), most of this territory was lost, and disputes over the actual title continue to this day (Douglas Creek etc).

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By Warnock (anonymous) | Posted June 07, 2011 at 06:44:02 in reply to Comment 64649

You have the wrong war here, undustrial. Joseph Brant was a war chief of the Mohawk during the American Revolution. The Six Nations were given the land on the Grand after that conflict, almost 30 years before the War of 1812. During the 1812 war only a portion of the Six Nations were active but their role important.

Tecumseh was one of several Aboriginal leaders and he was killed in the one battle he fought in Canada. More involved in the defence of Canada were Six Nations from the Grand, the so-called Seven Nations of Canada, Anishabe people from the upper Lakes, Mississauga living in British North America, etc. all led by their own War chiefs.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By wandamesh (registered) | Posted July 04, 2011 at 05:08:00

Conflicts between countries must be settled by talks not by means of war. It is time to have peace. On the other hand, scholars have released a study through Brown University tallying up the previous ten years of war expenses and added in for secondary costs of these battles. Almost 250,000 have passed away in the Iran and Afghan conflicts, and the fiscal expenses may reach $4 trillion or even more. These battles might be why the federal government isn't rushing for installment loans to cover anything else in the nation.

Permalink | Context

View Comments: Nested | Flat

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to comment.

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds