Raise the Hammer
Winter idling is bad for the environment and is even bad for your car.
By Thom Oommen
Feb. 9, 2007
Winter has finally arrived despite our best efforts, willing or otherwise, to contribute to climate change (and I was just getting used to riding my bike in relative comfort during winter.) I suppose it's a good sign that we can still rely on some things in life.
One of the things I used to count on in winter as a boy was my father's morning ritual. No not shaving or showering, but just as common: winter idling. You see, if my dad's car didn't have a good twenty minutes of idling in the morning, the engine would stall as he drove along to work.
During the 1980s and earlier, winter idling was a necessity if one chose to drive. I wasn't alone; we all witnessed this parental behaviour every day the temperature dropped below zero. These memories stick with you and inform your choices later in life.
Unfortunately, today people still behave like it's the 1980s (in more ways than one). The myth of "essential" winter idling remains very powerful for many drivers. Since 1990, though, advances in technology have negated any technical need to idle in winter.
When was the last time you or someone you know stalled their car? It doesn't happen any more, thanks to fuel injection and computerized engines. The average car today has more processing power than the Apollo 11 spacecraft that landed humans on the moon.
Natural Resources Canada recommends a maximum of 30 seconds of idling in winter, to get fluids moving, followed by consistent and steady driving; if you gun it you're more likely to stall.
For one thing, idling doesn't actually get all a vehicle's parts moving. Only driving does that: a vehicle is more than an engine. Even worse, excessive idling can corrode exhaust systems and foul spark plugs, which leads to decreased fuel efficiency. Nobody enjoys a trip to the mechanic for no good reason.
Many people already know that from a technical standpoint, their vehicle doesn't need to idle in winter. The sole reason they idle is to warm the interior.
Is comfort a good justification for fuelling climate change or poor air quality? Do you want to breathe in all that exhaust or have your children do so? What health impacts might this have? I'm still amazed to watch people casually clean the snow off their vehicles in a cloud of chemicals in the morning.
A car is not a coat. If the steering wheel is cold, get some driving gloves. If you're cold when you get in, please ponder what you're wearing. Maybe that light jacket isn't enough - think about a thick coat, toque and scarf instead.
I assure you that well-dressed kids and even a bundled-up baby can handle a cold car in the morning. When did Canadians get so soft?
With the City of Hamilton seriously pondering an anti-idling by-law, Hamiltonians would be advised to rethink some of the myths of and reasons behind winter idling.
I encourage you, dear reader, to pass on this information to your family and friends. It's the only way this wasteful behaviour will ever be changed.
If education is the only tool available for reducing idling, it will have minimal effect.
Better are laws prohibiting it, but this will only motivate those who need a small nudge to comply.
Best is a societal push for person-to-person feedback on not idling. People really respond to shame, especially the SUV crowd who have purchased vehicles for nothing other than their curb appeal. Everywhere we see advice to do the opposite - don't encourage road rage for example - well, then the cluster***** can continue rationalizing their harmful behaviour.
Also necessary is some limitation on just how much the business world can crap on the environment with impunity. e.g. Why are remote car starters legal? Why is anything that will make a buck somehow glorified as having a uniformly positive impact?
TO have Hamilton saying "please don't idle, it pollutes" while letting any shmuck buy a remote car starter at the local canadian tire, well, try harder next time.
Do you people really think that you will make a difference by enacting an anti-idling law? Just exactly who is going to be around 24 hours a day to enforce this law? The chief of police? There are bigger problems in this city, such as drugs/crime and the deplorable state of the city's roads. Poor roads result in more pollution than any "idling".
quoting:"Just exactly who is going to be around 24 hours a day to enforce this law?"
My point exactly. How would Capitalist's ego withstand strangers coming up and saying "please don't idle, it's polluting my children's lungs". THat's more effective than the law. More people need to do that. I will.
quoting: "Poor roads result in more pollution than any "idling"."
Wrong. Good roads result in more cars, which produces congestion, and slows more traffic, which equals more pollution. The only solutions are tolls or gas taxes.
You said it, Ted!
It's always just another person who wants to FIX THE WORLD BY MAKING THE SOCIETY AWARE!!!!!
I AM YOUR SAVIOR - TOUCH THE SCREEN!
You know what? Start worrying about your family, and yourself instead of spreading useless information.
Theories like this one, or using less water etc. just make me puke.
While you're saving and "taking care", a million of companies, factories and other businesses are doing their best to pollute and waste anything they can to gain profit, and "your way" will change nothing - it'll only make yourself worse.
So just think if it matters, cause it ain't to me.
NewsfeedsISSN: 1715-1554
(no upcoming events are currently listed)
Why Special Treatment for Auto Industry?, by Ted Mitchell, published Dec. 31, 2008 in Economy (30 comments)
Peak Oil, Falling Oil Prices, and the Global Economic Crisis, by Ryan McGreal, published Dec. 20, 2008 in Economy (36 comments)
Portables for Education Centre, by Ryan McGreal, published Dec. 18, 2008 in Revitalization (13 comments)
Scott Stewart Moving to Burlington, by Ryan McGreal, published Dec. 17, 2008 in Politics (3 comments)
Cluster Bomb Treaty and the World's Unfinished Business, by Ramzy Baroud, published Dec. 15, 2008 in Geopolitics (3 comments)
No Accountability Without Access to Information, by Ryan McGreal, published Dec. 12, 2008 in Politics (3 comments)
Council: No Reconsideration of City Hall Plan, by Ryan McGreal, published Dec. 10, 2008 in Revitalization (7 comments)
Rae Withdraws, Ignatieff is Liberal Leader, by Ryan McGreal, published Dec. 9, 2008 in Politics - Federal (6 comments)
Last Chance for Limestone City Hall Fa#&231;ade, by RTH Staff, published Dec. 8, 2008 in Architecture (0 comments)
Harper: GG to Prorogue Parliament, by RTH Staff, published Dec. 4, 2008 in Politics - Federal (12 comments)
City Traffic Staff: Actuated Signals Will Accommodate Cyclists, by RTH Staff, published Dec. 4, 2008 in Transportation (8 comments)
Harper crosses the line in speech to nation, by Adrian Duyzer, published Dec. 4, 2008 in Politics - Federal (20 comments)
By Ray
Posted 2/12/2007 8:49:45 PM
My brother used to live in Germany, and he says every fall, there is a reminder in the papers against winter idling. According to him, the reason is the engine heats up relatively slowly in idling (because there is no load), so it runs on cold oil, which doesn't lubricate as well, for a longer time, causing more wear. If you drive away quickly instead of idling, the oil gets warmed up faster and the engine gets its proper lubrication sooner. Of course, don't gun the engine until the oil gets nice and hot.
(Permalink)